<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traditional Media Influence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shodless.com/media-influence/barefoot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shodless.com/media-influence/barefoot/</link>
	<description>Understanding barefoot and minimalist running</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://shodless.com/media-influence/barefoot/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shodless.com/?p=120#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Thank you, and I do agree! I enjoy yours as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, and I do agree! I enjoy yours as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob (Downtown Runner)</title>
		<link>http://shodless.com/media-influence/barefoot/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob (Downtown Runner)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shodless.com/?p=120#comment-197</guid>
		<description>There are very few, if any, panaceas in life.  Certainly barefoot running (BFR) is not one either.  But I gave up a long time ago with thinking the media would accurately portray anything.  Fair and Balanced is rare indeed.

So while its fun to talk and debate about the plusses and minuses of BFR, I&#039;ve decided that the proof will be in the pudding.  As more and more of use experience real benefits, over long periods of time, the real truth will become more accurately reported....

Enjoying the blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are very few, if any, panaceas in life.  Certainly barefoot running (BFR) is not one either.  But I gave up a long time ago with thinking the media would accurately portray anything.  Fair and Balanced is rare indeed.</p>
<p>So while its fun to talk and debate about the plusses and minuses of BFR, I&#8217;ve decided that the proof will be in the pudding.  As more and more of use experience real benefits, over long periods of time, the real truth will become more accurately reported&#8230;.</p>
<p>Enjoying the blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://shodless.com/media-influence/barefoot/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shodless.com/?p=120#comment-193</guid>
		<description>The high impact heel strike definitely doesn&#039;t seem quite &quot;right&quot;, and it looks like more and more research is stating as such. Obviously everyone is different, and it&#039;s quite possible that some people would strive under such conditions, especially after conditioning themselves their whole lives for it.

I think there is something to be said for not forcing it and starting like a newborn. Most people who aren&#039;t injured don&#039;t want to take a few steps back in their training in order to be able to fully change things up. If you look at the greats in other sports though, they understand that they can not practice two different types of motion and hope one will rub off on the other (e.g. heel striking in shoes and midfoot/forefoot striking barefoot). When Tiger Woods has revamped his swing, he did not practice 50% of one swing and 50% of another.

If you split your millage between those two types of running I think you would completely retard your body.

Congrats on running injury free and thanks for the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The high impact heel strike definitely doesn&#8217;t seem quite &#8220;right&#8221;, and it looks like more and more research is stating as such. Obviously everyone is different, and it&#8217;s quite possible that some people would strive under such conditions, especially after conditioning themselves their whole lives for it.</p>
<p>I think there is something to be said for not forcing it and starting like a newborn. Most people who aren&#8217;t injured don&#8217;t want to take a few steps back in their training in order to be able to fully change things up. If you look at the greats in other sports though, they understand that they can not practice two different types of motion and hope one will rub off on the other (e.g. heel striking in shoes and midfoot/forefoot striking barefoot). When Tiger Woods has revamped his swing, he did not practice 50% of one swing and 50% of another.</p>
<p>If you split your millage between those two types of running I think you would completely retard your body.</p>
<p>Congrats on running injury free and thanks for the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave C.</title>
		<link>http://shodless.com/media-influence/barefoot/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shodless.com/?p=120#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Rob,
I agree with your stance that runners which are recovering from an injury seem to adopt barefoot or minimalist running much better. I agree because I feel that described my situation exactly. I got into the anti-shoe trend after busting up my knee in a footrace last year, and was hoping that I would be able to run without injury in the future by trying out minimalist shoes. 

To be honest, what I think finally healed my patello-femoral pain was getting back out there and running barefoot. From an article I read, I suspect there is a naturally restorative aspect to running, for the human knee, that allows nutrients to reach the avascular (no blood vessels) cartilage in the knee. Theoretically the pneumatic pumping action of the knee compressing while running pushes fluid into the cartilage. 

I suppose running with poor form in thick shoes hinders this process and could keep it from functioning properly. The high impact of heel striking probably exacerbates the problem too, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,<br />
I agree with your stance that runners which are recovering from an injury seem to adopt barefoot or minimalist running much better. I agree because I feel that described my situation exactly. I got into the anti-shoe trend after busting up my knee in a footrace last year, and was hoping that I would be able to run without injury in the future by trying out minimalist shoes. </p>
<p>To be honest, what I think finally healed my patello-femoral pain was getting back out there and running barefoot. From an article I read, I suspect there is a naturally restorative aspect to running, for the human knee, that allows nutrients to reach the avascular (no blood vessels) cartilage in the knee. Theoretically the pneumatic pumping action of the knee compressing while running pushes fluid into the cartilage. </p>
<p>I suppose running with poor form in thick shoes hinders this process and could keep it from functioning properly. The high impact of heel striking probably exacerbates the problem too, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

